Background: PRAGMA-CF is a clinically validated visual chest CT scoring method, quantifying relevant components of structural airway damage in CF. We aimed to validate a newly developed AI-based automated PRAGMA-AI and Mucus Plugging algorithm using the visual PRAGMA-CF as reference. Material and Methods: The study included 363 retrospective chest CT's of 178 CF patients (100 New-Zealand and Australian, 78 Dutch) with at least one inspiratory CT matching the image selection criteria. Eligible CT scans were analyzed using visual PRAGMA-CF, automated PRAGMA-AI and Mucus Plugging algorithm. Outcomes were compared using descriptive statistics, correlation, intra- and interclass correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Sensitivity analyses evaluated the impact of disease severity, study cohort, number of slices and convolution kernel (soft vs. hard). Results: The algorithm successfully analyzed 353 (97 %) CT scans. A strong correlation between the methods was found for %bronchiectasis ( ¾) and %disease ( %DIS), but weak for %Airway wall thickening ( %AWT). The automated Mucus plugging outcomes showed strong correlation with visual %mucus plugging ( %MP). ICC's between visual and automated sub-scores witnessed average agreement for ¾ and %DIS, except for %AWT which was weak. Sensitivity analyses revealed that convolution kernel did not affect the correlation between visual and automated outcomes, but harder kernels yielded lower disease scores, especially for ¾ and %AWT. Conclusion: Our results show that AI-derived outcomes are not identical to visual PRAGMA-CF scores in size, but strongly correlated on measures of bronchiectasis, bronchial-disease and mucus plugging. They could therefore be a promising alternative for time-consuming visual scoring, especially in larger studies.

Validation of an artificial intelligence-based automated PRAGMA and mucus plugging algorithm in pediatric cystic fibrosis

Ciet, Pierluigi
Writing – Review & Editing
;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background: PRAGMA-CF is a clinically validated visual chest CT scoring method, quantifying relevant components of structural airway damage in CF. We aimed to validate a newly developed AI-based automated PRAGMA-AI and Mucus Plugging algorithm using the visual PRAGMA-CF as reference. Material and Methods: The study included 363 retrospective chest CT's of 178 CF patients (100 New-Zealand and Australian, 78 Dutch) with at least one inspiratory CT matching the image selection criteria. Eligible CT scans were analyzed using visual PRAGMA-CF, automated PRAGMA-AI and Mucus Plugging algorithm. Outcomes were compared using descriptive statistics, correlation, intra- and interclass correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Sensitivity analyses evaluated the impact of disease severity, study cohort, number of slices and convolution kernel (soft vs. hard). Results: The algorithm successfully analyzed 353 (97 %) CT scans. A strong correlation between the methods was found for %bronchiectasis ( ¾) and %disease ( %DIS), but weak for %Airway wall thickening ( %AWT). The automated Mucus plugging outcomes showed strong correlation with visual %mucus plugging ( %MP). ICC's between visual and automated sub-scores witnessed average agreement for ¾ and %DIS, except for %AWT which was weak. Sensitivity analyses revealed that convolution kernel did not affect the correlation between visual and automated outcomes, but harder kernels yielded lower disease scores, especially for ¾ and %AWT. Conclusion: Our results show that AI-derived outcomes are not identical to visual PRAGMA-CF scores in size, but strongly correlated on measures of bronchiectasis, bronchial-disease and mucus plugging. They could therefore be a promising alternative for time-consuming visual scoring, especially in larger studies.
2025
Artificial Intelligence
Computed tomography
Cystic fibrosis
PRAGMA
Quantification
Validation
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Validation of an artificial intelligence-based automated PRAGMA and mucus plugging algorithm in pediatric cystic fibrosis_JCF2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 2.86 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.86 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/471369
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact