Background: COVID-19 increased psychological distress among healthcare workers. Italian studies have suggested lower distress levels among mental health professionals compared to hospital-based colleagues. Methods: In May 2025, we conducted a cross-sectional observational study in community mental health centers and non-psychiatric hospital outpatient departments in Sardinia, Italy, involving 101 professionals from three community mental health centers and 97 staff members from four non-psychiatric hospital outpatient departments. The SF-12 was used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the PHQ-9 was used to assess depressive symptoms. Results were also compared with pre-pandemic community samples. Results: Mental health professionals reported fewer depressive symptoms and better quality of life than hospital-based colleagues: PHQ-9 ≥ 10: 10.9% vs. 35.0% (11/101 vs. 34/97) (OR = 0.23; 95%CI 0.11–0.47; p < 0.001); PHQ-9 ≥ 9: 14.8% vs. 38.1% (OR = 0.31; 95%CI 0.16–0.60; p < 0.001). Mean PHQ-9 score: 4.45 ± 3.51 vs. 8.35 ± 3.95 (p < 0.001). Low HRQoL (SF-12 ≤ 36): 34.6% vs. 62.9% (35/101 vs. 61/97) (OR = 0.31; 95%CI 0.19–0.52; p < 0.001). No significant within-group differences were found by sex, age, or professional role. Compared with pre-pandemic community data, the well-being of mental health professionals remained stable. Limitations: Cross-sectional design and convenience sampling limit causal inference and generalizability. Conclusions: The organizational structure, operational flexibility, and peer collaboration typical of community-based services may contribute to the sustained psychological well-being of mental health professionals.

Community Mental Health Professionals in Italy Report Higher Well-Being than Hospital-Based Outpatient Staff in 2025: A Cross-Sectional Study

Mereu, Noemi M.;Primavera, Diego;Cossu, Giulia;Forte, Viviana;Cantone, Elisa
2026-01-01

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 increased psychological distress among healthcare workers. Italian studies have suggested lower distress levels among mental health professionals compared to hospital-based colleagues. Methods: In May 2025, we conducted a cross-sectional observational study in community mental health centers and non-psychiatric hospital outpatient departments in Sardinia, Italy, involving 101 professionals from three community mental health centers and 97 staff members from four non-psychiatric hospital outpatient departments. The SF-12 was used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the PHQ-9 was used to assess depressive symptoms. Results were also compared with pre-pandemic community samples. Results: Mental health professionals reported fewer depressive symptoms and better quality of life than hospital-based colleagues: PHQ-9 ≥ 10: 10.9% vs. 35.0% (11/101 vs. 34/97) (OR = 0.23; 95%CI 0.11–0.47; p < 0.001); PHQ-9 ≥ 9: 14.8% vs. 38.1% (OR = 0.31; 95%CI 0.16–0.60; p < 0.001). Mean PHQ-9 score: 4.45 ± 3.51 vs. 8.35 ± 3.95 (p < 0.001). Low HRQoL (SF-12 ≤ 36): 34.6% vs. 62.9% (35/101 vs. 61/97) (OR = 0.31; 95%CI 0.19–0.52; p < 0.001). No significant within-group differences were found by sex, age, or professional role. Compared with pre-pandemic community data, the well-being of mental health professionals remained stable. Limitations: Cross-sectional design and convenience sampling limit causal inference and generalizability. Conclusions: The organizational structure, operational flexibility, and peer collaboration typical of community-based services may contribute to the sustained psychological well-being of mental health professionals.
2026
depressive symptoms; healthcare workers; mental health services; organizational factors; PHQ-9; quality of life; resilience; SF-12
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
psychiatryint-07-00081 (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 286.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
286.4 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/481925
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact