In his posthumous The Chronology of the Ancient Kingdoms Amended (1728) Isaac Newton re-dated a number of significant events in ancient history, most importantly the Argonautic expedition and the Fall of Troy. This article explores the eighteenth-century reception of the Chronology as a text contiguous with Newton's previous works on natural philosophy. In particular, it will be argued that the Chronology was considered as proof that the moderns had made history into a scientific discipline based on principles like those delineated in Newton's Principia.
Antiquitas non fingo: Newton, the moderns and the science of ancient history
Mattana A.
2020-01-01
Abstract
In his posthumous The Chronology of the Ancient Kingdoms Amended (1728) Isaac Newton re-dated a number of significant events in ancient history, most importantly the Argonautic expedition and the Fall of Troy. This article explores the eighteenth-century reception of the Chronology as a text contiguous with Newton's previous works on natural philosophy. In particular, it will be argued that the Chronology was considered as proof that the moderns had made history into a scientific discipline based on principles like those delineated in Newton's Principia.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mattana - Antiquitas non fingo.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione
172.88 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
172.88 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
Mattana - Antiquitas OA.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
versione post-print (AAM)
Dimensione
705.53 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
705.53 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNICA sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono protetti da diritto d'autore, salvo diversa indicazione.



