This article offers a critical analysis of contemporary debates on social innovation, highlighting the conceptual ambiguity and rhetorical inflation that characterise its current usage. Despite its widespread adoption as a solution to unmet social needs, the notion of social innovation often lacks epistemological clarity and is frequently mobilised to align with neoliberal logics of welfare retrenchment, marketisation, and the depoliticisation of structural inequalities. The article contrasts dominant managerial and entrepreneurial approaches with perspectives that situate social innovation within broader processes of collective action and socio-ecological transformation. Four domains –state retrenchment, the entanglement with capitalist economic structures, cultural cooptation, and gentrification – are identified as areas in which social innovation may generate ambivalent or adverse effects. The analysis also challenges common colonial myths that portray social innovation as inherently positive or progressive. The article ultimately calls for a situated and critically informed epistemology capable of recognising the political, relational, and context-dependent nature of practices labelled as social innovation.

Contro l’innovazione sociale

Emanuela Span?
2026-01-01

Abstract

This article offers a critical analysis of contemporary debates on social innovation, highlighting the conceptual ambiguity and rhetorical inflation that characterise its current usage. Despite its widespread adoption as a solution to unmet social needs, the notion of social innovation often lacks epistemological clarity and is frequently mobilised to align with neoliberal logics of welfare retrenchment, marketisation, and the depoliticisation of structural inequalities. The article contrasts dominant managerial and entrepreneurial approaches with perspectives that situate social innovation within broader processes of collective action and socio-ecological transformation. Four domains –state retrenchment, the entanglement with capitalist economic structures, cultural cooptation, and gentrification – are identified as areas in which social innovation may generate ambivalent or adverse effects. The analysis also challenges common colonial myths that portray social innovation as inherently positive or progressive. The article ultimately calls for a situated and critically informed epistemology capable of recognising the political, relational, and context-dependent nature of practices labelled as social innovation.
2026
social innovation; collective action; socialwashing; socio-ecological transformation; critical theory
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNICA sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono protetti da diritto d'autore, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/492845
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex 0
social impact