We reply to the comments raised by Ośmiałowski and Kolehmainen in their discussion on conformations of ureidic receptors as set out in our article (M. Olivari et al., New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 663–669). Here we appreciate the common views we share and welcome the clarity this gives, and we discuss and question some of their criticisms of the original paper and clarify our opinion in this area.

Reply to the ‘Comment on “Non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly’ by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen

CALTAGIRONE, CLAUDIA;ISAIA, FRANCESCO;LIPPOLIS, VITO;MONTIS, RICCARDO;OLIVARI, MARTINA;SCORCIAPINO, MARIANO ANDREA
2014-01-01

Abstract

We reply to the comments raised by Ośmiałowski and Kolehmainen in their discussion on conformations of ureidic receptors as set out in our article (M. Olivari et al., New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 663–669). Here we appreciate the common views we share and welcome the clarity this gives, and we discuss and question some of their criticisms of the original paper and clarify our opinion in this area.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/79259
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact