Abstract OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of, and identify factors associated with, hand and wrist US alterations in a large cohort of SLE patients. METHODS: One hundred and eight consecutive SLE patients were recruited and classified according to arthropathy type and the musculoskeletal item of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 score. US examinations were performed on hand and wrist flexor tendons, wrist extensor tendons, second and third MCP and wrist joints bilaterally using a multi-planar scanning technique. RESULTS: US examination showed joint involvement in 42/108 (38.8%) subjects, tendon involvement in 44/108 (40.7%) and both in 22/108 (20.3%). Patients with rhupus syndrome (n = 8) carried a higher incidence of inflammatory changes (87%) and erosions (87%) compared with the six with Jaccoud's arthropathy (50% and 17%, respectively) and the 94 with non-deforming X-ray non-erosive arthropathy (37% and 21%, respectively). Power Doppler signal was prevalent in patients scoring A (n = 4) or B (n = 9) on the musculoskeletal item of the BILAG 2004, and was significantly more frequent at the joint (92%) and tendon (54%) level than in the 26 patients scoring C (19%, P = 0.0007 and 15%, P = 0.016, respectively) and in the 69 scoring D (3%, P < 0.0001 and 3%, P < 0.0001). US changes in patients who scored C or D were more expressed at the tendon level (50% and 29%, respectively) than at the joint level (35% and 9%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The picture of musculoskeletal US in SLE depends on arthropathy subtype and disease activity. US examination could be a valid and reliable tool to monitor musculoskeletal features and therapeutic outcomes in SLE patients.

Joint and tendon involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: an ultrasound study of hands and wrists in 108 patients

GABBA, ALESSANDRA;PIGA, MATTEO;CAULI, ALBERTO;MATHIEU, ALESSANDRO
2012-01-01

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of, and identify factors associated with, hand and wrist US alterations in a large cohort of SLE patients. METHODS: One hundred and eight consecutive SLE patients were recruited and classified according to arthropathy type and the musculoskeletal item of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 score. US examinations were performed on hand and wrist flexor tendons, wrist extensor tendons, second and third MCP and wrist joints bilaterally using a multi-planar scanning technique. RESULTS: US examination showed joint involvement in 42/108 (38.8%) subjects, tendon involvement in 44/108 (40.7%) and both in 22/108 (20.3%). Patients with rhupus syndrome (n = 8) carried a higher incidence of inflammatory changes (87%) and erosions (87%) compared with the six with Jaccoud's arthropathy (50% and 17%, respectively) and the 94 with non-deforming X-ray non-erosive arthropathy (37% and 21%, respectively). Power Doppler signal was prevalent in patients scoring A (n = 4) or B (n = 9) on the musculoskeletal item of the BILAG 2004, and was significantly more frequent at the joint (92%) and tendon (54%) level than in the 26 patients scoring C (19%, P = 0.0007 and 15%, P = 0.016, respectively) and in the 69 scoring D (3%, P < 0.0001 and 3%, P < 0.0001). US changes in patients who scored C or D were more expressed at the tendon level (50% and 29%, respectively) than at the joint level (35% and 9%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The picture of musculoskeletal US in SLE depends on arthropathy subtype and disease activity. US examination could be a valid and reliable tool to monitor musculoskeletal features and therapeutic outcomes in SLE patients.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Post print version.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Articolo su rivista
Tipologia: versione post-print (AAM)
Dimensione 170.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
170.05 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/99989
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 18
  • Scopus 94
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 75
social impact