Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System
We investigate the origin of the elliptical ring structure observed in the images of the supermassive black hole M87∗, aiming to disentangle contributions from gravitational, astrophysical, and imaging effects. Leveraging the enhanced capabilities of the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT)’s 2018 array, including improved (u, v)-coverage from the Greenland Telescope, we measured the ring’s ellipticity using five independent imaging methods, obtaining a consistent average value of τ = 0.08+−000302 with a position angle of ξ = 50.1−+7662 degrees. To interpret this measurement, we compared it to general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) simulations spanning a wide range of physical parameters including the thermal or nonthermal electron distribution function, spins, and ion-to-electron temperature ratios in both low- and high-density regions. We find no statistically significant correlation between spin and ellipticity in GRMHD images. Instead, we identify a correlation between ellipticity and the fraction of non-ring emission, particularly in nonthermal models and models with higher jet emission. These results indicate that the ellipticity measured from the M87∗ emission structure is consistent with that expected from simulations of turbulent accretion flows around black holes, where it is dominated by astrophysical effects rather than gravitational ones. Future high-resolution imaging, including space very long baseline interferometry and long-term monitoring, will be essential to isolate gravitational signatures from astrophysical effects.
Origin of the ring ellipticity in the black hole images of M87 *
Rohan Dahale;Ilje Cho;Kotaro Moriyama;Kaj Wiik;Paul Tiede;Jos?? L. G??mez;Chi-kwan Chan;Roman Gold;Vadim Y. Bernshteyn;Marianna Foschi;Britton Jeter;Hung-Yi Pu;Boris Georgiev;Abhishek V. Joshi;Alejandro Cruz-Osorio;Iniyan Natarajan;Avery E. Broderick;Le??n D. S. Salas;Koushik Chatterjee;Kazunori Akiyama;Ezequiel Albentosa-Ru??z;Antxon Alberdi;Walter Alef;Juan Carlos Algaba;Richard Anantua;Keiichi Asada;Rebecca Azulay;Uwe Bach;Anne-Kathrin Baczko;David Ball;Mislav Balokovi??;Bidisha Bandyopadhyay;John Barrett;Michi Baub??ck;Bradford A. Benson;Dan Bintley;Lindy Blackburn;Raymond Blundell;Katherine L. Bouman;Geoffrey C. Bower;Michael Bremer;Roger Brissenden;Silke Britzen;Dominique Broguiere;Thomas Bronzwaer;Sandra Bustamante;Douglas Ferreira Carlos;John E. Carlstrom;Andrew Chael;Dominic O. Chang;Shami Chatterjee;Ming-Tang Chen;Yongjun Chen;Xiaopeng Cheng;Pierre Christian;Nicholas S. Conroy;John E. Conway;Thomas M. Crawford;Geoffrey B. Crew;Yuzhu Cui;Brandon Curd;Jordy Davelaar;Mariafelicia De Laurentis;Roger Deane;Jessica Dempsey;Gregory Desvignes;Jason Dexter;Vedant Dhruv;Indu K. Dihingia;Sheperd S. Doeleman;Sergio A. Dzib;Ralph P. Eatough;Razieh Emami;Heino Falcke;Joseph Farah;Vincent L. Fish;Edward Fomalont;H. Alyson Ford;Raquel Fraga-Encinas;William T. Freeman;Per Friberg;Christian M. Fromm;Antonio Fuentes;Peter Galison;Charles F. Gammie;Roberto Garc??a;Olivier Gentaz;Gertie Geertsema;Ciriaco Goddi;Arturo I. G??mez-Ruiz;Minfeng Gu;Mark Gurwell;Kazuhiro Hada;Daryl Haggard;Ronald Hesper;Dirk Heumann;Luis C. Ho;Paul Ho;Mareki Honma;Chih-Wei L. Huang;Lei Huang;David H. Hughes;Shiro Ikeda;C. M. Violette Impellizzeri;Makoto Inoue;Sara Issaoun;David J. James;Buell T. Jannuzi;Michael Janssen;Wu Jiang;Alejandra Jim??nez-Rosales;Michael D. Johnson;Svetlana Jorstad;Adam C. Jones;Taehyun Jung;Ramesh Karuppusamy;Tomohisa Kawashima;Garrett K. Keating;Mark Kettenis;Dong-Jin Kim;Jae-Young Kim;Jongsoo Kim;Junhan Kim;Motoki Kino;Jun Yi Koay;Prashant Kocherlakota;Yutaro Kofuji;Patrick M. Koch;Shoko Koyama;Carsten Kramer;Joana A. Kramer;Michael Kramer;Thomas P. Krichbaum;Cheng-Yu Kuo;Noemi La Bella;Sang-Sung Lee;Aviad Levis;Zhiyuan Li;Rocco Lico;Greg Lindahl;Michael Lindqvist;Mikhail Lisakov;Jun Liu;Kuo Liu;Elisabetta Liuzzo;Wen-Ping Lo;Andrei P. Lobanov;Laurent Loinard;Colin J. Lonsdale;Amy E. Lowitz;Ru-Sen Lu;Nicholas R. MacDonald;Jirong Mao;Nicola Marchili;Sera Markoff;Daniel P. Marrone;Alan P. Marscher;Iv??n Mart??-Vidal;Satoki Matsushita;Lynn D. Matthews;Lia Medeiros;Karl M. Menten;Izumi Mizuno;Yosuke Mizuno;Joshua Montgomery;James M. Moran;Monika Moscibrodzka;Wanga Mulaudzi;Cornelia M??ller;Hendrik M??ller;Alejandro Mus;Gibwa Musoke;Ioannis Myserlis;Hiroshi Nagai;Neil M. Nagar;Dhanya G. Nair;Masanori Nakamura;Gopal Narayanan;Antonios Nathanail;Santiago Navarro Fuentes;Joey Neilsen;Chunchong Ni;Michael A. Nowak;Junghwan Oh;Hiroki Okino;H??ctor Ra??l Olivares S??nchez;Tomoaki Oyama;Feryal ??zel;Daniel C. M. Palumbo;Georgios Filippos Paraschos;Jongho Park;Harriet Parsons;Nimesh Patel;Ue-Li Pen;Dominic W. Pesce;Vincent Pi??tu;Aleksandar PopStefanija;Oliver Porth;Ben Prather;Giacomo Principe;Dimitrios Psaltis;Venkatessh Ramakrishnan;Ramprasad Rao;Mark G. Rawlings;Luciano Rezzolla;Angelo Ricarte;Bart Ripperda;Jan R??der;Freek Roelofs;Cristina Romero-Ca??izales;Eduardo Ros;Arash Roshanineshat;Helge Rottmann;Alan L. Roy;Ignacio Ruiz;Chet Ruszczyk;Kazi L. J. Rygl;Salvador S??nchez;David S??nchez-Arg??elles;Miguel S??nchez-Portal;Mahito Sasada;Kaushik Satapathy;Saurabh;Tuomas Savolainen;F. Peter Schloerb;Jonathan Schonfeld;Karl-Friedrich Schuster;Lijing Shao;Zhiqiang Shen;Sasikumar Silpa;Des Small;Bong Won Sohn;Jason SooHoo;Kamal Souccar;Joshua S. Stanway;He Sun;Fumie Tazaki;Alexandra J. Tetarenko;Remo P. J. Tilanus;Michael Titus;Kenji Toma;Pablo Torne;Teresa Toscano;Efthalia Traianou;Tyler Trent;Sascha Trippe;Matthew Turk;Ilse van Bemmel;Huib Jan van Langevelde;Daniel R. van Rossum;Jesse Vos;Jan Wagner;Derek Ward-Thompson;John Wardle;Jasmin E. Washington;Jonathan Weintroub;Robert Wharton;Maciek Wielgus;Gunther Witzel;Michael F. Wondrak;George N. Wong;Qingwen Wu;Nitika Yadlapalli;Paul Yamaguchi;Aristomenis Yfantis;Doosoo Yoon;Andr?? Young;Ziri Younsi;Wei Yu;Feng Yuan;Ye-Fei Yuan;Ai-Ling Zeng;J. Anton Zensus;Shuo Zhang;Guang-Yao Zhao;Shan-Shan Zhao
2025-01-01
Abstract
We investigate the origin of the elliptical ring structure observed in the images of the supermassive black hole M87∗, aiming to disentangle contributions from gravitational, astrophysical, and imaging effects. Leveraging the enhanced capabilities of the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT)’s 2018 array, including improved (u, v)-coverage from the Greenland Telescope, we measured the ring’s ellipticity using five independent imaging methods, obtaining a consistent average value of τ = 0.08+−000302 with a position angle of ξ = 50.1−+7662 degrees. To interpret this measurement, we compared it to general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) simulations spanning a wide range of physical parameters including the thermal or nonthermal electron distribution function, spins, and ion-to-electron temperature ratios in both low- and high-density regions. We find no statistically significant correlation between spin and ellipticity in GRMHD images. Instead, we identify a correlation between ellipticity and the fraction of non-ring emission, particularly in nonthermal models and models with higher jet emission. These results indicate that the ellipticity measured from the M87∗ emission structure is consistent with that expected from simulations of turbulent accretion flows around black holes, where it is dominated by astrophysical effects rather than gravitational ones. Future high-resolution imaging, including space very long baseline interferometry and long-term monitoring, will be essential to isolate gravitational signatures from astrophysical effects.
accretion, accretion disks black hole physics galaxies: active gravitation
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/463631
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
ND
ND
ND
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.