A comparison between two major political figures, Einaudi and Giolitti, allows us to appreciate two different conceptions of liberal thought. Einaudi’s liberalism is the result of the studies of an economist who believes in the market and opposes reforms that control the means of production, creating the foundations of a welfare state. In contrast, for Giolitti, liberalism is a practice that must lay the foundations for social progress through the mediation between capital and labor, in order to collectively pursue the goal of national growth and development. Consequently, a profound disagreement arises between Einaudi and Giolitti, including over the principle of popular representation and the emancipation of the masses.

Luigi Einaudi contre Giovanni Giolitti: entre libéralisme économique et médiation politique

marco pignotti
2025-01-01

Abstract

A comparison between two major political figures, Einaudi and Giolitti, allows us to appreciate two different conceptions of liberal thought. Einaudi’s liberalism is the result of the studies of an economist who believes in the market and opposes reforms that control the means of production, creating the foundations of a welfare state. In contrast, for Giolitti, liberalism is a practice that must lay the foundations for social progress through the mediation between capital and labor, in order to collectively pursue the goal of national growth and development. Consequently, a profound disagreement arises between Einaudi and Giolitti, including over the principle of popular representation and the emancipation of the masses.
2025
Italian Political System; Liberalism; Giolitti; Welfare state; Masses
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bozza 04 - BABEL Civ - interno - 23.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 6.92 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.92 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/464927
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact